@FlexDW And it takes A LOT to make that call at the legislation level because it’s a societal conversation, not a mere technical application of law
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/913765886527492096
Year: 2017
913765619778105348
@FlexDW So the issue is: the decision to sacrifice X to save Y in dangerous situations lies in the hands of regulators who decide who lives and dies
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/913765619778105348
913765070227767296
@FlexDW In today’s world, the ultimate decision lies in the hands of a human driver, who is accountable for a mistake. With AI who’s accountable?
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/913765070227767296
913764887989506053
@FlexDW Probably, but this is WAY more complex. AI behaviour depends on car manufacturers, who in turn develop it according to policy. Who’s fault?
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/913764887989506053
913762921519374336
913747921505542145
913738978171420679
@FlexDW Again, I disagree. Devs are not hired/measured/rewareded for moral programming.But how innovative and reliable are the features they release
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/913738978171420679
913738588155731968
@FlexDW Actually, current laws don’t apply to AI. And it’s such a non-boring topic that I am meeting with a worldwide expert this w/e to discuss it.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/913738588155731968
913729644448411653
Starting to see 280 char tweets from people I follow. It’s unusual, dense. Much heavier cognitive load. Interesting.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/913729644448411653
913650412019994624
@tegmark maybe I missed something in both Life 3.0 and Superintelligence? The issue of free will for a super AGI?
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/913650412019994624