Amazon #reMARS keynote: https://t.co/2mhZqGhu4Y https://t.co/GraLMoi23f

RT @samcharrington: Interesting synthetic data use case from the Amazon Go keynote at #reMARS. They generated thousands of synthetic palm i…

Let’s start by cancelling furniture.

https://t.co/yOps6pvDp8

UK Inflation Rises to New 40-Year High With More Gains Expected (but it just went from 9% to 9.1%).
(the real news is that) Bank of England expects rate to rise above 11% in October.

https://t.co/f8W3DuBIjR https://t.co/y49GsKg0x4

@_msw_ So, if Proteus is *fully* autonomous, I am assuming that Kiva was *not fully* autonomous. And I can’t understand what part was not autonomous (per previous definition).

@_msw_ Thank you. I read all these articles, and saw videos like this one: https://t.co/j6ir4Lkrmu

The point I was making is that “autonomous” means “capable of operating without direct human control”, and Kiva (caged, and depending on stickers) already seemed to fit the definition.

@_msw_ That’s the part I was hoping to understand better: I thought Kiva robots were pretty autonomous and followed non-fixed paths, too. If the robot operates behind a cage or not, it doesn’t change how autonomous it is – it becomes a matter of semantics.

Venture-capital-as-a-service >

Inside Tiger Global’s Close Ties to Consulting Firm Bain & Co. https://t.co/1KP7uQNdMJ

@_msw_ So it’s purely that. I thought that there was more given the “fully autonomous mobile robot” connotation.

“Just Walk Out” is the most frictionless and disruptive technology Amazon has ever released. Investors and the general public have yet to realise its enormous potential (for and outside the retail experience). >

Look back on 10 years of Amazon robotics https://t.co/D3EhCIHjhB