Apparently, MS took a white label approach for SC2012 portal. Deep customization is a critical capabilities our customers demand.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/179608407475630080
179607816326230019
SC2012 provisioning portal can be customized using SharePoint admin tools and extended with web parts. Another great feature.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/179607816326230019
179607353807732736
So MS offers a SC2012 mgmt pack that includes out-of-the-box provisioning request templates. That’s great. All vendors should do the same.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/179607353807732736
179606653207969793
SC2012 customization editor for self-service provisioning request could be better. It gets confusing quickly IMO.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/179606653207969793
179606104093900800
@lucaventurelli You mean “selectively”, not “religiously”…
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/179606104093900800
179605758600683520
Apparently, SC2012 has a sort of web-based monitor console to debug automation workflows. If so, very nice.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/179605758600683520
179604502318555136
Nice that SC2012 offers customization for the self-service provisioning request form.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/179604502318555136
179604251381727234
To standardize catalog offering the org needs to go through a profound cultural change.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/179604251381727234
179602794347634689
That’s that little “3rd party management tools” that is critical. How well Opalis integrates with the outside world after MS acquisition?
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/179602794347634689
179602321188196354
So catalog offering standardization relies on a CMDB. Problem is when you already have more then 1 in house, and none of them is healthy…
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/179602321188196354