Press releases about SDN technologies definitively win the award as most vague and confusing announcements in 2012.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/212289801242677250
212125490591436800
212117112347557888
@mreferre Not necessarily. For an ISV, “supporting” a cloud could mean providing both the virtual appliance and the delivery blueprint.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/212117112347557888
212115493983760385
@mreferre The question is: who could do a better job at designing the app blueprint? The cloud management vendor or the ISV? @reillyusa
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/212115493983760385
212114968944975875
@mreferre Every cloud management vendor has or is working on application delivery blueprints. You could include HP CloudMaps too @reillyusa
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/212114968944975875
212106478042103808
@reillyusa @mreferre Or, ISVs have to start shipping software with delivery blueprints for a number of supported cloud environments.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/212106478042103808
212105645577605121
@reillyusa Sure. You just have to stay within the 6 months window between new API releases.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/212105645577605121
212105044290576384
@reillyusa Amazon confirms that CloudFormation could be invoked by other (maybe on premises) orchestrators in chained complex workflows
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/212105044290576384
212104176522641408
@reillyusa Agree again. OVF didn’t really progress quickly enough to fit the need. @mreferre Extensibility requires many parts to agree
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/212104176522641408
212103737550974976
@reillyusa Isn’t CloudFormation a raw form of run book automation?
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/giano/status/212103737550974976